Re: [AMBER-Developers] NVE vs NTP timings for latest gpu-tachyon code

From: David A Case <case.biomaps.rutgers.edu>
Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2013 21:32:39 -0400

On Tue, Aug 06, 2013, Scott Le Grand wrote:

> This why the Monte Carlo Barostat is crucial... I can't do much more for
> traditional NTP - it needs more 64-bit oomph than NVE, twice as much in
> fact, and that really hits consumeer GK104 and GK110 GPUs.

Anyone know where we stand on this? Is the MC barostat running on the CPU
pmemd code? (or in sander)?

...thx...dac


_______________________________________________
AMBER-Developers mailing list
AMBER-Developers.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber-developers
Received on Tue Aug 06 2013 - 19:00:02 PDT
Custom Search