Re: [AMBER-Developers] minor issue with BUFFER_SIZE in ptraj()

From: Scott Brozell <sbrozell.rci.rutgers.edu>
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2013 18:31:40 -0400

Hi,

I have increased this to 99989 - the last 5 digit emirp.

However, note that we are transitioning to cpptraj, which has no
size limitations analogous to this.
We welcome comments on cpptraj.

scott

On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 10:35:43AM +0000, Hannes Loeffler wrote:
> I think there is a minor issue with the buffer size in ptraj() (file
> ptraj.c) which is currently defined as
>
> char buffer[BUFFER_SIZE]
>
> with BUFFER_SIZE set to 1024. This may be a bit small (my
> extension routines take lists of masks and some users obviously like to
> have lots of them) but more importantly ptraj() does not issue a
> sensible warning of overly long input lines.

_______________________________________________
AMBER-Developers mailing list
AMBER-Developers.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber-developers
Received on Wed Mar 13 2013 - 16:00:03 PDT
Custom Search