We should check if any of the references can be updated as well - things
that say 'in press', 'in prep' etc.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jason Swails [mailto:jason.swails.gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, July 02, 2012 1:35 PM
> To: AMBER Developers Mailing List
> Subject: Re: [AMBER-Developers] Having to run configure multiple times
>
> On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 4:31 PM, David A Case
> <case.biomaps.rutgers.edu>wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Jul 02, 2012, Jason Swails wrote:
> > >
> > > This is the exact proposal. I'm making the tarball tonight (along
> with
> > the
> > > quick fix to configure, to be released as bugfix.13).
> > >
> > > My only point of concern is whether we name the new tarball
> > > AmberTools12.13.tar.bz2 or AmberTools12.tar.bz2 (either way, it
> will be
> > > identical to *original* AmberTools12 + bugfix.1-13, and
> ./patch_amber.py
> > > --patch-level will correctly reflect the patch state).
> > >
> > > The worry with adding the 13 is that users may mistakenly think
> they need
> > > to update (is this even a problem?). The worry about not adding
> the 13
> > is
> > > that then the download is silently changed (again, is this a
> problem?).
> >
> > Let's not change the name.
> >
> > >
> > > Maybe we take the time to update the manual in the doc directory
> (and the
> > > > one on the website) with the errata while we are at it?
> >
> > Go ahead and use the AmberTools12.pdf file that is in the master
> branch...I
> > think everything there is OK. It's possible that a bit of the
> cpptraj
> > stuff
> > only refers to post-Amber12 changes, but I don't think that will
> cause
> > problems. [I fixed the "--" problem in the patch_amber.py
> documentation.]
> >
> > > I agree with this, but Dave may want to weigh in here with the
> > implications
> > > with Lulu and the published version...
> >
> > We'll just have Lulu a bit out of sync...very few people seem to want
> the
> > bound versions anyway.
> >
>
> We got several :). I hate having to hunt through the PDFs for stuff...
>
> My other email can be ignored, the answer is in here.
>
> Thanks!
> Jason
>
> --
> Jason M. Swails
> Quantum Theory Project,
> University of Florida
> Ph.D. Candidate
> 352-392-4032
> _______________________________________________
> AMBER-Developers mailing list
> AMBER-Developers.ambermd.org
> http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber-developers
_______________________________________________
AMBER-Developers mailing list
AMBER-Developers.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber-developers
Received on Mon Jul 02 2012 - 14:30:03 PDT
