You sure you are using the DPDP precision model? - You have to use that if
you want a direct comparison with the CPU code, otherwise you are probably
just seeing rounding differences. Here's what I have for CPU DPDP and SPDP:
This is for $AMBERHOME/test/cuda/chamber/dhfr_cmap
CPU
 NSTEP =        0   TIME(PS) =       0.000  TEMP(K) =   359.72  PRESS =
0.0
 Etot   =     -3135.7721  EKtot   =      2230.2661  EPtot      =
-5366.0381
 BOND   =       129.4500  ANGLE   =       439.9122  DIHED      =
754.0478
 UB     =        31.8773  IMP     =        18.5859  CMAP       =
-85.1050
 1-4 NB =       367.0926  1-4 EEL =      6507.3376  VDWAALS    =
-1009.1558
 EELEC  =    -10036.4148  EGB     =     -2483.6659  RESTRAINT  =
0.0000
DPDP
 NSTEP =        0   TIME(PS) =       0.000  TEMP(K) =   359.72  PRESS =
0.0
 Etot   =     -3135.7721  EKtot   =      2230.2661  EPtot      =
-5366.0381
 BOND   =       129.4500  ANGLE   =       439.9122  DIHED      =
754.0478
 UB     =        31.8773  IMP     =        18.5859  CMAP       =
-85.1050
 1-4 NB =       367.0926  1-4 EEL =      6507.3376  VDWAALS    =
-1009.1558
 EELEC  =    -10036.4148  EGB     =     -2483.6659  RESTRAINT  =
0.0000
These two match identically as one would expect.
SPDP
 NSTEP =        0   TIME(PS) =       0.000  TEMP(K) =   359.72  PRESS =
0.0
 Etot   =     -3135.7797  EKtot   =      2230.2661  EPtot      =
-5366.0458
 BOND   =       129.4500  ANGLE   =       439.9122  DIHED      =
754.0478
 UB     =        31.8773  IMP     =        18.5859  CMAP       =
-85.1050
 1-4 NB =       367.0926  1-4 EEL =      6507.3376  VDWAALS    =
-1009.1559
 EELEC  =    -10036.4166  EGB     =     -2483.6715  RESTRAINT  =
0.0000
SPDP has differences in VDWAALS in last decimal place, which is 8th sig fig
and EELEC in 3 decimal place which is also 8th sig fig. EGB differs in 2nd
decimal place which is 6th sig fig but this is expected since it is also a
function of the GB radii so there are more terms involved than the VDWAALS
or EELEC.
Can you try again and post the differences you see as well as your GPU specs
and compiler versions.
All the best
Ross
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Thomas Cheatham [mailto:tec3.utah.edu]
> Sent: Sunday, May 27, 2012 9:23 PM
> To: Ross Walker
> Subject: Re: [AMBER-Developers] [AMBER] manual prmtop file editing for
> free energy calculation
> 
> 
> dhfr_cmap
> 
> ..had the differences...
_______________________________________________
AMBER-Developers mailing list
AMBER-Developers.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber-developers
Received on Sun May 27 2012 - 23:00:02 PDT