Re: [AMBER-Developers] lib and lib64

From: David A Case <case.biomaps.rutgers.edu>
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2012 08:36:53 -0500

On Fri, Feb 10, 2012, Andreas Goetz wrote:

> agoetz.gecko:~> ll $AMBERHOME/AmberTools/lib64
> total 804K
> -rw-r--r-- 1 agoetz users 794K Feb 9 17:48 libnetcdf.a
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 agoetz users 785 Feb 9 17:48 libnetcdf.la
> agoetz.gecko:~> ll $AMBERHOME/lib64
> total 5.2M
> -rw-r--r-- 1 agoetz users 7.1K Feb 9 17:48 libDiagnostics.a
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 agoetz users 912 Feb 9 17:48 libDiagnostics.la
> -rw-r--r-- 1 agoetz users 320K Feb 9 17:48 libGA.a
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 agoetz users 885 Feb 9 17:48 libGA.la

...etc

These all look like things generated by autotools, coming from mtkpp or netcdf.
Since these get put in different places by different OS'es, and since all of
Amber is not using autotools, the soft-link idea may be what we have to do.
But I'm scratching my head about why this problem never came up until now.

....dac


_______________________________________________
AMBER-Developers mailing list
AMBER-Developers.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber-developers
Received on Fri Feb 10 2012 - 06:00:03 PST
Custom Search