On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 05:42:53PM -0400, David A. Case wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 13, 2011, Scott Brozell wrote:
>
> > But your motivations don't persuade me that it has
> > significant advantages for Amber.
> >
> > In 2005 we eliminated cmdc and leapfrogged over the C preprocessor
> > to compiler invoked Fortran preprocessors using .F, etc.
> > There have been very few problems;
>
> I'm a little lost: are you saying that it worked fine for columbus, but that
> there were no significant advantages?
It worked fine for Columbus.
Eliminating cmdc had significant advantages.
There was no reason to go to the C preprocessor for Columbus
because it seemed like Fortran could handle the preprocessing
(this has been shown true) and because Columbus is Fortran centric.
scott
_______________________________________________
AMBER-Developers mailing list
AMBER-Developers.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber-developers
Received on Thu Oct 13 2011 - 17:00:03 PDT
