Hello,
I'm predicting that the configure and config.h files have changed enough
that amber11's Makefiles won't be able to use it to install...
All the best,
Jason
On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 7:34 AM, case <case.biomaps.rutgers.edu> wrote:
> Hi everyone:
>
> An initial release candidate (prepared by mkrelease_at) is here:
>
> http://ambermd.org/downloads/AmberTools.01mar11.tar.bz2
>
> Take a look, try it out on different compilers, etc. The difference from
> what is in the git repo is that only certain files are present here, so
> something may be missing.
>
> Also, here is a good experiment: take a clean amber11 distribution
> (does the "amber11-with-patches" branch work??), then untar AmberTools1.5
> on top of AmberTools1.4. The make and test both AmberTools and Amber. We
> need to find out if there are inconsistencies between AmberTools1.5 and
> Amber11.
>
> Note that the size of AmberTools is now 120 Mbytes in bzip2 form; version
> 1.4
> was 67 Mbytes. Of course, we now have many new things, but if you see
> something that could be left out, or made smaller, please speak up. We
> have
> users with slow internet connections, and keeping the size down is a plus.
>
> ...thanks...dac
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> AMBER-Developers mailing list
> AMBER-Developers.ambermd.org
> http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber-developers
>
--
Jason M. Swails
Quantum Theory Project,
University of Florida
Ph.D. Candidate
352-392-4032
_______________________________________________
AMBER-Developers mailing list
AMBER-Developers.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber-developers
Received on Fri Mar 04 2011 - 05:00:07 PST
