Hi,
Yes, my recommendation conflicts with that sentence from the wiki.
Who wrote 'no F2003' and when ?
scott
On Thu, Oct 07, 2010 at 03:53:06PM -0400, Jason Swails wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 3:26 PM, Scott Brozell <sbrozell.rci.rutgers.edu>wrote:
>
> > iargc() should be replaced with command_argument_count().
> > The wiki aludes to these problems, but does not yet indicate the
> > best current practice which is described below from my cvs log.
> > http://ambermd.org/pmwiki/index.php/Main/Coding
> >
> > Date: Sat May 23 19:36:48 2009 +0000
> > Replaced gnu iargc() with f2003 standard command_argument_count().
> > The same could be done for getarg. Some compilers like gnu already
> > support these f2003 routines in preference to the old gnu ones:
> >
>
> Where does this fit in with " Don't use any Fortran 2003 constructs." from
> the coding guidelines? Or is it not strictly f2003?
>
> Jason
>
> http://www.nag.co.uk/nagware/np/r51_doc/relnotes.html
> > http://docs.sun.com/source/819-3684/2_F95_Intrins.html
> > However, some compilers directly support neither:
> > pgf90 7.0-4 64-bit target on x86-64 Linux
> > but later versions only support the f2003 routines:
> > pgf90 8.0-5 64-bit target on x86-64 Linux -tp k8-64e
> > cpp -traditional -P -DBINTRAJ -DSQM sqm.f > _sqm.f
> > pgf90 -c -O1 -Mfree -o sqm.o _sqm.f
> > PGF90-S-0038-Symbol, iargc, has not been explicitly declared (_sqm.f)
> > 0 inform, 0 warnings, 1 severes, 0 fatal for sqm
> >
> > Scott
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 06, 2010 at 11:48:38AM -0300, Gustavo Seabra wrote:
> > > Works now. Looks like PGI is being even stricter than gnu...
> > >
> > > On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 11:18 AM, Jason Swails <jason.swails.gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > > i just added iargc to the narg integer declaration line -- try now? It
> > > > wasn't giving problems on gfortran or ifort
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 10:13 AM, Jason Swails <jason.swails.gmail.com
> > >wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> I may have... I did try compiling on kraken with the PGI compilers.
> > Let me
> > > >> check (my fault, since it's my source file anyway)
> > > >>
> > > >> On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 9:59 AM, Gustavo Seabra <
> > gustavo.seabra.gmail.com>wrote:
> > > >>>
> > > >>> I'm trying to compile AmberTools serial using PGI compilers, from a
> > > >>> freshly cloned branch (pulled from master a few minutes ago), but
> > > >>> compilation is dying with this error:
> > > >>>
> > > >>> PGF90-S-0038-Symbol, iargc, has not been explicitly declared
> > (calcpka.f90:
> > > >>> 114)
> > > >>> 0 inform, 0 warnings, 1 severes, 0 fatal for calcpka
> > > >>> PGF90-S-0026-Unmatched quote (calcpka.f90: 331)
> > > >>> 0 inform, 0 warnings, 1 severes, 0 fatal for usage
> > > >>> make[1]: *** [calcpka] Error 2
> > > >>> make[1]: Leaving directory `amber/AmberTools/src/etc'
_______________________________________________
AMBER-Developers mailing list
AMBER-Developers.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber-developers
Received on Thu Oct 07 2010 - 15:30:02 PDT
