On Fri, Oct 01, 2010, Jason Swails wrote:
>
> This seems to be a bigger risk way back in the days of CVS. With how easy
> it is to create new branches, and the fact that we have an amber11 branch, I
> think makes it easier to create consistent patches from a static code base,
> as long as changes that are NOT turned into patches are not added to that
> tree. That being said, I don't want to add anything to the amber11 tree
> that will NOT turn into a bug fix, so should I unstage and discard the fix
> that I made to my local amber11 tree rather than pushing it?
Yes. The "amber11" branch is reserved for amber11 + published bug fixes.
Although you could (in principle) have a local "amber11" branch that
diverges from the official one, that is dangerous, since some future push
might do more than you intend.
...thx...dac
_______________________________________________
AMBER-Developers mailing list
AMBER-Developers.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber-developers
Received on Fri Oct 01 2010 - 05:30:09 PDT
