Re: [AMBER-Developers] Current amber CVS test fails

From: Mark Williamson <>
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 10:41:03 -0500

Robert Duke wrote:
> I am assuming you are not dinking with the energy, etc stuff in pmemd?
> I sorted the sander mess out in the pmemd code a long time ago,
> replacing it with a no-doubt imperfect, but nonetheless better "state
> information" abstraction, and model-specific (eg., gb, pme) records.
> Regards - Bob

Hi Bob,

No, the energy stuff in pmemd is great example and works perfectly; I
actually used part of this as an example for my new approach in sander.



AMBER-Developers mailing list
Received on Wed Mar 10 2010 - 08:00:04 PST
Custom Search