Re: [AMBER-Developers] bug in ptraj.c (AmberTools 1.3)

From: Daniel Roe <daniel.r.roe.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2010 12:22:56 -0500

nm - I see that Scott got to it already.

On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 12:20 PM, Daniel Roe <daniel.r.roe.gmail.com> wrote:

> This is fortunately not to big an issue, but it's always good to be
> thorough when it comes to keeping track of pointers.
>
> The line should read :
>
> if (parm!=NULL) clearParm(parm);
>
> since I believe the parm structure is not initialized if non-amber top is
> used. I will check this in to the CVS tree after testing.
>
> -Dan
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 11:57 AM, Hannes Loeffler <
> Hannes.Loeffler.stfc.ac.uk> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I think there is a bug in ptrajCleanup (ptraj.c) showing up in the last
>> line:
>>
>> clearParm(parm);
>>
>> Gdb tells me that parm is a null pointer when the function is called.
>> I should point out that I do not see this problem with AMBER top/crd
>> files but only with PSF/DCD input (NAMD generated).
>>
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Hannes.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> AMBER-Developers mailing list
>> AMBER-Developers.ambermd.org
>> http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber-developers
>>
>
>
>
> --
> -Dan
>



-- 
-Dan
_______________________________________________
AMBER-Developers mailing list
AMBER-Developers.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber-developers
Received on Mon Feb 22 2010 - 09:30:04 PST
Custom Search