not sure- it sounded like Scott suggested a script that ran through multiple
thread counts, generating output for each and diffing them against saves.
not difficult, but probably best to standardize all of the tests the same
way.
On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 9:45 AM, Jason Swails <jason.swails.gmail.com>wrote:
> $AMBERHOME/test/rem_gb_4rep has a script that tests for the number of
> processors... Is this the type of thing you're looking for?
>
> On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 9:19 AM, Carlos Simmerling
> <carlos.simmerling.gmail.com> wrote:
> > Scott, can you point me to something like a template for a test case that
> > does this, so I can set up something similar?
> > carlos
> >
> > On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 2:57 AM, Scott Brozell <sbrozell.rci.rutgers.edu
> >wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Now is a good time to reiterate that features requiring x parallel
> >> processors should have tests for 1 through x numbers of processors.
> >> These tests serve several purposes, notably:
> >> validating that the feature fails gracefully,
> >> and documenting the parallel requirements of the feature.
> >>
> >> Writers going the extra mile could have these test cases emit terse
> >> messages reminding users of the feature to run tests with at least x
> >> parallel processors.
> >>
> >> thanks to everyone that contributed to the thread:
> >> Subject: RE: [AMBER-Developers] incompatible processor requirements in
> >> parallel tests
> >>
> >> Scott
> >>
> >>
> >> ps's
> >>
> >> 1980's
> >> "I believe that the final bug in TeX was discovered and removed on
> >> November 27, 1985. But if, somehow, an error still lurks in the code,
> >> I shall gladly pay a finder's fee of $20.48 to the first person who
> >> discovers it. (This is twice the previous amount, and I plan to double
> >> it again in a year; you see, I really am confident!) "
> >> Don Knuth
> >>
> >> 2010
> >> http://www-cs-staff.stanford.edu/~uno/abcde.html#texbk<http://www-cs-staff.stanford.edu/%7Euno/abcde.html#texbk>
> <http://www-cs-staff.stanford.edu/%7Euno/abcde.html#texbk>
> >> If you do succeed in finding a previously undiscovered bug in the
> >> programs for either TeX or METAFONT, I shall gladly reward you with
> >> 0x$80.00 ($327.68) at the Bank of San Serriffe. Corrections to errors
> >> in The TeXbook or The METAFONTbook are worth 0x$1.00 ($2.56),
> >> as in all my other books.
> >>
> >> The Bank of San Serriffe
> >> http://www-cs-staff.stanford.edu/~uno/news08.html<http://www-cs-staff.stanford.edu/%7Euno/news08.html>
> <http://www-cs-staff.stanford.edu/%7Euno/news08.html>
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> AMBER-Developers mailing list
> >> AMBER-Developers.ambermd.org
> >> http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber-developers
> >>
> > _______________________________________________
> > AMBER-Developers mailing list
> > AMBER-Developers.ambermd.org
> > http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber-developers
> >
>
>
>
> --
> ---------------------------------------
> Jason M. Swails
> Quantum Theory Project,
> University of Florida
> Ph.D. Graduate Student
> 352-392-4032
>
> _______________________________________________
> AMBER-Developers mailing list
> AMBER-Developers.ambermd.org
> http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber-developers
>
_______________________________________________
AMBER-Developers mailing list
AMBER-Developers.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber-developers
Received on Sun Feb 21 2010 - 07:30:02 PST
