Re: [AMBER-Developers] multisander print statement

From: Carlos Simmerling <carlos.simmerling.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2010 11:07:35 -0500

i think it should be changed. if the printout already says the amber version
somewhere else, we don't even need to say it here.


On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 11:04 AM, Jason Swails <jason.swails.gmail.com>wrote:

> Hello,
>
> This is quite unimportant I'm pretty sure, but I was wondering if the
> plan was to keep multisander printing out that it is multisander
> version amber10, or if we were going to update it to say amber11?
>
> Running multisander version of sander amber10
> Total processors = 2
> Number of groups = 2
>
> It's easy enough to change, but I didn't want to make this change if
> the decision-makers wanted to keep it as amber10 because multisander
> hasn't been appreciably changed since that version? Not very
> important, but I think it might cause confusion leaving it the way it
> is...
>
> Thanks!
> Jason
>
> --
> ---------------------------------------
> Jason M. Swails
> Quantum Theory Project,
> University of Florida
> Ph.D. Graduate Student
> 352-392-4032
>
> _______________________________________________
> AMBER-Developers mailing list
> AMBER-Developers.ambermd.org
> http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber-developers
>
_______________________________________________
AMBER-Developers mailing list
AMBER-Developers.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber-developers
Received on Wed Feb 10 2010 - 08:30:04 PST
Custom Search