Re: [AMBER-Developers] Re: Atomic radii assignment for WAT molecules

From: Carlos Simmerling <carlos.simmerling.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 12:41:23 -0500

sorry- I saw this but was a bit too busy to look into the details. one issue
is that the OW gets different radii for diff PBradii sets- for example, 0.8
and 1.2 for mbondi and mbondi2- is this option included? a quick look made
it seem hardcoded to 0.8
thanks for doing this!
carlos

On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 12:20 PM, Scott Brozell <sbrozell.rci.rutgers.edu>wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Carlos please verify that this fixes bug 108 that you reported.
>
> Thanks MengJuei,
> Scott
>
> On Tue, Dec 01, 2009 at 10:53:44AM -0500, case wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 30, 2009, MengJuei Hsieh wrote:
> > >
> > > Forget about PQR, considering the context of algorithms inside the
> tleap,
> > > 0.8 Å radii should be the value that LEaP intended to assign.
> >
> > ...applied...thanks...dac
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> AMBER-Developers mailing list
> AMBER-Developers.ambermd.org
> http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber-developers
>
_______________________________________________
AMBER-Developers mailing list
AMBER-Developers.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber-developers
Received on Tue Dec 01 2009 - 10:00:05 PST
Custom Search