Robert Duke wrote:
> Looking back at the sander code, looks like the gb problem got fixed
> there by allocating skipv from 0 to natom - a better way to go than what
> you specified below.
I agree, this fix is much better than the one I suggested here. I will
test and commit, thank you.
As for the second bug, I will prepare the files for you so that you can
examine the changes.
regards,
Mark
_______________________________________________
AMBER-Developers mailing list
AMBER-Developers.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber-developers
Received on Wed Sep 02 2009 - 23:06:51 PDT
