David A. Case wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 26, 2009, Joe Krahn wrote:
>
>> The reason for having _REAL_ is to allow single-precision builds.
>
> But we don't *really* allow this, it just kind of looks like it. Since
> we really only support double precisions, "1.0d0" is fine. Trying to
> fix it would (a) be a *lot* of work; (b) would be error-prone; (c) might
> expose some compiler bugs we are not seeing now.
>
> So, my vote is to let this sleeping dog lie....
>
> ...dac
>
If so, then why not replace _REAL_ with DOUBLE PRECISION and at least
get rid of the dprec.h hack?
Joe
_______________________________________________
AMBER-Developers mailing list
AMBER-Developers.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber-developers
Received on Sun Mar 29 2009 - 01:08:52 PDT
