Re: [AMBER-Developers] Possible parallel Makefile bug pertaining to sander.LES target

From: Gustavo Seabra <gustavo.seabra.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 18:33:16 -0500

On Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 4:14 PM, David A. Case <case.biomaps.rutgers.edu> wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 24, 2009, Gustavo Seabra wrote:
>>
>> In principle, yes. But PUPIL is not compiled by default, so it may not
>> be a problem. Also, all files modified in PUPIL already get a
>> <filename>.PUPIL.o name in the object file.
>
> I think(?) it's the _*.f files, not the *.o files that are the problem.

Yes, you're right. Sorry.

Since sander.PUPIL is not compiled by default, we have never noticed
any problem with it. It may still be a good idea to do similar changes
for PUPIL.

Gustavo

_______________________________________________
AMBER-Developers mailing list
AMBER-Developers.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber-developers
Received on Sun Jan 25 2009 - 01:25:50 PST
Custom Search