Re: amber-developers: Broken TI Test cases (icfe=2)

From: David A. Case <case.scripps.edu>
Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2007 15:06:58 -0800

On Fri, Dec 21, 2007, Ilyas Yildirim wrote:
>
> Is there any reason why icfe=2 is removed from AMBER10?

As far as I can see, the softcore options eliminate the need for icfe=2
(and probably for klambda>1 as well).

I'm certainly open to counter-arguments. But making both the code and the
documentation simpler has its appeal.

Let me know what you think....dave 

-- 
==================================================================
David A. Case                     |  e-mail:      case.scripps.edu
Dept. of Molecular Biology, TPC15 |  fax:          +1-858-784-8896
The Scripps Research Institute    |  phone:        +1-858-784-9768
10550 N. Torrey Pines Rd.         |  skype:                 dacase
La Jolla CA 92037  USA            |    http://www.scripps.edu/case
==================================================================
Received on Sun Dec 23 2007 - 06:07:36 PST
Custom Search