On 8/27/06, Scott Brozell <sbrozell.scripps.edu> wrote:
>
> If you distribute gnu make and if it could be merged into the build
> process
> as simply as changing the path of the make, eg:
>
> setenv AMBERHOME
> ./configure bla
> $AMBERHOME/exe/gnumake bla
>
> > Note that gleap is really going to require a modern build environment.
>
> Why
>
xleap was based on Xt lib and its building process is relativly easy
compared with gleap which may be based on Gtk or Qt and require autoconf.
> ... there have been two really clean,
> > consistent models of programming so far:
> > the C model and the Lisp model.
> > These two seem points of high ground,
> > with swampy lowlands between them.
> > --Paul Graham
>
> I would like to know the context of this quote.
> As it stands I disagree with this quote in many ways.
Would u show some points of your disagreement, so I can explain to u based
on my experiences.
Scott
>
>
--
... there have been two really clean,
consistent models of programming so far:
the C model and the Lisp model.
These two seem points of high ground,
with swampy lowlands between them.
--Paul Graham
Received on Sun Aug 27 2006 - 06:07:33 PDT
