On Tue, May 02, 2006, Ray Luo wrote:
> Here is the bugfix. This should've been caught in Amber8 ... I don't
> understand why it is okay with most compilers.
Thanks...I've posted the bugfix and updated the amber10 cvs tree to reflect
this change.
Is there a patch needed for Amber 8? In a quick survey, I didn't see where
this was there? Since a lot of people still use Amber8, please prepare
a patch for that as well.
...thx...dac
Received on Wed May 03 2006 - 06:07:12 PDT
