This one was a re-fit of ff02pol. ff02pol was developed by Piotr. But the
mainchain torsions were not calibrated (or tested). The "ff05pol" is
really "ff02pol" with a set of new main chain torsion. In the
sense it is "ff02polm05" :).
I should have been more careful. But I already put the "ff05pol" name on
the paper (sorry!), although Piotr is also one of the authors on the
paper. "ff03pol" does not quite make sense since it is really different
than ff03.
yong
On Fri, 15 Jul 2005, David A. Case wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 14, 2005, Yong Duan wrote:
> >
> > Did I deposit as "ff05"? I thought I put it under the title "ff05pol".
>
> You are correct. But in view of our discussion, do you think maybe this
> should be called "ff03pol"?
>
> ...dac
>
Received on Wed Apr 05 2006 - 23:49:54 PDT
