RE: amber-developers: Question concerning wildcards in dihedral definitions.

From: Ross Walker <>
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2005 20:09:47 -0700

> I think(?) that all of the stuff Ross picked up on is unique
> to parm99.dat:

This appears to be true but even so I think we should look to permanently
solve the problem in some way. Either by somehow working out how to fix
(remember there is the unexplained problem I get with NMA as well) or by
removing all the wild cards and just having explicit torsion terms. I am
favour of the last option as then it is much clearer what is going on,
terms are defined and what aren't etc.

Although there may be good reasons for keeping the wildcards that I am

All the best

|\oss Walker

| Department of Molecular Biology TPC15 |
| The Scripps Research Institute |
| Tel:- +1 858 784 8889 | EMail:- |
| | PGP Key available on request |

Note: Electronic Mail is not secure, has no guarantee of delivery, may not
be read every day, and should not be used for urgent or sensitive issues.
Received on Wed Apr 05 2006 - 23:49:55 PDT
Custom Search