Ok ... I will definitely need to give more specific info ...
yong
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-amber-developers.scripps.edu
> [mailto:owner-amber-developers.scripps.edu] On Behalf Of David A. Case
> Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2004 10:19 AM
> To: amber-developers.scripps.edu
> Subject: Re: amber-developers: Polarizability (amber8 vs amber41)
>
>
> On Wed, May 19, 2004, Yong Duan wrote:
> >
> >
> > We should be able to stay in amber8, in theory. But I just
> somehow can
> > not have a reliable minimization with ntb=0 in amber8 (I
> need gas-phase
> > optimization); it tries and then quits and complains ewald
> bomb, blah,
> > blah ...
>
> Come on, Yong. The only way things get fixed is if you give
> some details
> about your problem, and (for example) post the input files
> you are using.
>
> ...thanks...dac
>
> --
>
> ==================================================================
> David A. Case | e-mail: case.scripps.edu
> Dept. of Molecular Biology, TPC15 | fax: +1-858-784-8896
> The Scripps Research Institute | phone: +1-858-784-9768
> 10550 N. Torrey Pines Rd. | home page:
> La Jolla CA 92037 USA | http://www.scripps.edu/case
> ==================================================================
>
Received on Wed Apr 05 2006 - 23:50:02 PDT
